- #CARBONITE ENDPOINT BACKUP MANAGEMENT PORTAL ANDROID#
- #CARBONITE ENDPOINT BACKUP MANAGEMENT PORTAL MAC#
The Carbonite Server solution provides a much more robust server backup solution, and protects dozens of platforms, NAS systems, and applications. It also could protect a select number of applications. The Mozy solution could backup external hard drives, NAS and Linux systems. Mozy had a few features that may seem missing at first glance. The solutions are both secure providing data encryption for data in-flight and at rest as well as LDAP based management for end users. Both solutions also provide centralized control of policies as well as administration. Both products feature a web-based administration portal enabling IT to manage hundreds of endpoints easily.
#CARBONITE ENDPOINT BACKUP MANAGEMENT PORTAL ANDROID#
Carbonite Endpoint also supports mobile devices (iOS 8 and later and Android 4.1 and later), which are increasingly becoming a significant part of user workflow.
#CARBONITE ENDPOINT BACKUP MANAGEMENT PORTAL MAC#
From a user perspective, both products deploy silently and support Windows and Mac devices. Transitioning from protecting endpoints on Mozy to Carbonite should be easy. Comparing Carbonite Endpoint to Mozy Endpoint What’s the Same? Now with Carbonite’s purchase of Mozy, those customers can switch to the Carbonite platform and be confident in continuous updates to the product as well as new, advanced features. It also means selecting a solution that is continuously updated to support new platforms and provide protection from new threats.įor years Mozy customers have counted on the service to protect their endpoint data. Getting an “A” means the organization must select an endpoint protection solution that runs at an organizational level, and is controlled by IT administrators. Organizations must get an “A” in their endpoint protection process. Endpoint protection is not a pass/fail situation. However, an FSS solution does not provide an organization with visibility of its data, and it doesn’t protect items outside of the shared folder. In all fairness, (FSS) solutions can do a passable job of restoring users’ data, including some historical information. Also, organizations shouldn’t count on file sync and share solutions to “act” as the backup solution. Organizations can’t get by with a “just copy important files to the file server” protection strategy. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.Protecting endpoints is no longer up for debate. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner's research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner Disclaimer: Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in our research publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. and/or its affiliates and is used herein with permission. The GARTNER PEER INSIGHTS CUSTOMERS’ CHOICE badge is a trademark and service mark of Gartner, Inc. Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in this content nor makes any warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this content, about its accuracy or completeness, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Gartner® Peer Insights™ content consists of the opinions of individual end users based on their own experiences, and should not be construed as statements of fact, nor do they represent the views of Gartner or its affiliates. Gartner, Gartner Peer Insights ‘Voice of the Customer’: Privileged Access Management, Peer Contributors, 21 December 2021. Gartner, Magic Quadrant for Privileged Access Management, By Michael Kelley, etc., 19 July 2022.
0 kommentar(er)
